i think it was a bad analogy. he was talking about competent evil for eg ai enhanced weapons systems vs incompetent evil for eg middle easterners stoning people coz of religion.
both are evil but you can rationalise competent evil coz you're getting something real done like preventing the upending of the moral world order.
both are evil but you can rationalise competent evil coz you're getting something real done like preventing the upending of the moral world order.