> Not the parent, but I'm not sure I understand your reasoning.
Didn't reason much. But I think that you misread what I wrote.
> You download firefox. In firefox, you go to settings->Extensions to download extensions and get exposed to google analytics, is that correct?
Yes.
> If that's true, how is it not insidious that in order to download the thing that blocks google analytics, you have to get exposed to google analytics?
I never said anything in my post about what I think about mozzila using google analytics on their webpages.
All I said is that firefox never came with google analytics. Which is true. Extensions page just loaded a webpage which used google analytics. If that is enough to qualify firefox as coming with google analytics, well, you could always go to google.com meaning that firefox started coming with google analytics the day GA was created.
Didn't reason much. But I think that you misread what I wrote.
> You download firefox. In firefox, you go to settings->Extensions to download extensions and get exposed to google analytics, is that correct?
Yes.
> If that's true, how is it not insidious that in order to download the thing that blocks google analytics, you have to get exposed to google analytics?
I never said anything in my post about what I think about mozzila using google analytics on their webpages.
All I said is that firefox never came with google analytics. Which is true. Extensions page just loaded a webpage which used google analytics. If that is enough to qualify firefox as coming with google analytics, well, you could always go to google.com meaning that firefox started coming with google analytics the day GA was created.