Comment

Comment by thaumaturgy

> Respond to the arguments leveled

I replied to the words you wrote. If what you wrote doesn't say what you meant to say, fine, but don't come at me for it.

> The starting position is: get rid of them. The 2nd order consideration is "hmm, what problems might that cause?"

Alright, I can go along with that. Then the 3rd order consideration would have to be, "okay, here are the possible problems it could cause, and here is the evidence for and against."

And that is where I've been working this subject from from the beginning of this thread.

> I came in requesting evidence for your assumptions and you've confirmed you do not have any.

...other than the multiple links to discussions, books, papers, and opinion pieces from subject matter experts, you mean? I notice none of your comments happened to come with any supporting evidence for your argument. We're supposed to just believe that eradicating these pests would cause a worse outcome than the current amount of human misery they cause worldwide because... why? Because of your hypothetical aliens and because humans use science to cause ecological harm?

Maybe take a step back and reassess.

parent thaumaturgy 27 days ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton