I do it all the time, and I get feedback about tons of things that need to be fixed. I ask Claude to review ChatGPT code and vice versa. I also ask Claude to review Claude code, and it finds issues as well. I ask it to review copy I wrote and offer style, grammar, voice, and consistency suggestions. LLMs make pretty darn good reviewers.
In this case, what matters most is that the AI security review raised real issues that needed to be fixed. That is valuable.
In this case, what matters most is that the AI security review raised real issues that needed to be fixed. That is valuable.