In the past 4 years the definition of what AGI would even be has been changed so many times that new marketing claims fit the description that the term itself no longer has any meaning.
However, it is reasonable to assume that the current architecture will just not be it. It works well for certain problems, and falls apart for several others.
Unrelated to your comment, more a general comment on the online discourse:
What I don't understand is why people get so defensive about and offended by the thought that more progress in the basics of the approaches could be needed. That doesn't change the performance of LLMs now, and it also doesn't change what could be possible in the future.
Why are people so deeply and personally invested in the current state of the art?
However, it is reasonable to assume that the current architecture will just not be it. It works well for certain problems, and falls apart for several others.
Unrelated to your comment, more a general comment on the online discourse:
What I don't understand is why people get so defensive about and offended by the thought that more progress in the basics of the approaches could be needed. That doesn't change the performance of LLMs now, and it also doesn't change what could be possible in the future.
Why are people so deeply and personally invested in the current state of the art?