Your response completely misses the point the author is making, which I find a really common attribute among AI evangelists looking to earn a quick upvote.
The author isn't asking the world to "slow down" or "lower the rim"; they're asking the world to reevaluate its priorities and re-center human achievement over raw output. If you want to disagree with that request, that's one thing, but do it by engaging with the author's actual point rather than inventing a different one that you think you can dunk on.
The author isn't asking the world to "slow down" or "lower the rim"; they're asking the world to reevaluate its priorities and re-center human achievement over raw output. If you want to disagree with that request, that's one thing, but do it by engaging with the author's actual point rather than inventing a different one that you think you can dunk on.