biased opinions andd disucssion are fine, in this instance, a link to the same story as a primary source with a non editorialized title is what I was suggestion from Dang or whoever it is that makes those changes these days.
Guess I'll take my negative 4 votes for suggesting that reuters may be a better primary source. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Guess I'll take my negative 4 votes for suggesting that reuters may be a better primary source. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯