Most GDP numbers look at real growth, not nominal, which would filter out the 30% number you’re talking about. Under those numbers about 1/10 of the growth is rent, not 1/3
But if your core take is “GDP is meaningless in post industrial countries”, then you’re at a level of crank not worth engaging with
But if your core take is “GDP is meaningless in post industrial countries”, then you’re at a level of crank not worth engaging with