I asked my question because I have an opinion, and I wanted to hear the creator's perspective. Your question had nothing to do with any of it, and is irrelevant.
You can call it "technical pedantry", but what you actually meant is "precision and logic". Which is relevant to make a connection. Your new fallacy is called "ad hominem", btw.
And there is one more logical fallacy hidden in your message: training an LLM on a lot of data is not the same thing as then relying on that lossy data once training is done.
You can call it "technical pedantry", but what you actually meant is "precision and logic". Which is relevant to make a connection. Your new fallacy is called "ad hominem", btw.
And there is one more logical fallacy hidden in your message: training an LLM on a lot of data is not the same thing as then relying on that lossy data once training is done.