As well as the absurdity of even this happening, the claim that this is a "more accurate" term is patently false.
Up to now intelligence has been attributed to living beings, the "artificial" indicates that it is intelligence of something that isn't a living being. Also living beings could be "super" intelligent, and many (most, all so far?) instances of artificial intelligence are not super intelligent.
The irony of someone so lacking in intelligence renaming a category of intelligence, and getting it so wrong.
Up to now intelligence has been attributed to living beings, the "artificial" indicates that it is intelligence of something that isn't a living being. Also living beings could be "super" intelligent, and many (most, all so far?) instances of artificial intelligence are not super intelligent.
The irony of someone so lacking in intelligence renaming a category of intelligence, and getting it so wrong.