The original article is excellent, and this one appears to be urging folks to stop having such basic reactions to the original. I think the appeal of the original is that the daughter is now 16(?) and has opinions on her parents' decisions in her schooling. She makes good points, but she's also a teenager and the grass is always greener … nuance.
The original article is excellent, and this one appears to be urging folks to stop having such basic reactions to the original. I think the appeal of the original is that the daughter is now 16(?) and has opinions on her parents' decisions in her schooling. She makes good points, but she's also a teenager and the grass is always greener … nuance.