> This marks a key step in our exploration of the RSI path: scaling RL compute on verifiable, complex tasks, so the model can continuously expand its capability frontier through exploration and feedback.
Gotta love a capable open model. BUT, how can they just casually throw in that they're actively exploring RSI as if it's just another technique? Is this not alarming at all?
Gotta love a capable open model. BUT, how can they just casually throw in that they're actively exploring RSI as if it's just another technique? Is this not alarming at all?