More perhaps at the appearance of logic. I still find all models make easy to find mistakes in logic, if you think carefully about what they say. Usually they allow "close enough" assumptions that are not, actually, close enough.
When I ask about acoustics, they still often make incorrect assumptions, e.g. overlooking that they are speaking of logarithmic display of digital levels when the discussion has shifted to SPL (sound pressure level in air).
When I ask about acoustics, they still often make incorrect assumptions, e.g. overlooking that they are speaking of logarithmic display of digital levels when the discussion has shifted to SPL (sound pressure level in air).