> [2Fe-2S] is two high-spin Fe(III) centres, each d5 with S = 5/2.
I assumed S = 1/2 but a quick google search says that it may be 1/2 or 5/2. So it makes a lot of sense.
> I've submitted the underlying paper here twice before as a Zenodo link, but it didn't get much discussion.
There has been too much slop recently, I'm using a modified version of https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html where you start at +5 instead of -5. Nature and Science adds -1. Zenodo adds +1.
As I said before, this post makes sense. I'm still not sure it's correct and I didn't miss any detail, but it's not stupid-AI-slop.
I like https://github.com/PureStateLabs/sqd-spin-referee/blob/main/... better, the link at the top looks like standard AI generated stuff.
Links to the previous posts:
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49097083 (with my old comment)
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49203707 (with an interesting comment by alpineidyll3)
> [2Fe-2S] is two high-spin Fe(III) centres, each d5 with S = 5/2.
I assumed S = 1/2 but a quick google search says that it may be 1/2 or 5/2. So it makes a lot of sense.
> I've submitted the underlying paper here twice before as a Zenodo link, but it didn't get much discussion.
There has been too much slop recently, I'm using a modified version of https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html where you start at +5 instead of -5. Nature and Science adds -1. Zenodo adds +1.
As I said before, this post makes sense. I'm still not sure it's correct and I didn't miss any detail, but it's not stupid-AI-slop.