Comment

Comment by impendia

In practice, mathematicians' workloads have been a function of their work ethic, motivation, and competing demands on their time. There's no big-picture question of "how much math there is to do now"; the amount of remaining math to discover has long been presumed to be, for all intents and purposes, infinite. (Similar questions are relevant on a much smaller scale -- for example in case of someone who has specialized in a narrow specialty which goes dead.)

Your (1) is most certainly true.

As for your (2), most mathematicians I know have at most a passing interest in formalization, Mathlib, and Lean. My understanding, which is admittedly quite superficial, is that AI is actually getting quite good at translating human-readable mathematics. I could be mistaken about this, but even if there is a lot of human work to do, it sounds like a lot of anal-retentive oversight of work you didn't do yourself -- the sort of task that academics love to complain about!

Perhaps human interest in Lean will grow, but I don't anticipate it occupying the attention of more than a small slice of the community.

Your (3) is an interesting question. I work on the theoretical rather than applied side, but what you describe might very well be true for applied mathematicians.

parent impendia 1 month ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton