Comment Comment by LittleLily I agree it's a bit annoying, but a better solution than using `as` is just telling reduce what its generic type should be:tasks.reduce<Record<string, (t: typeof tasks[number]) => boolean>>((acc, item) => ..., {})Also imo it's cleaner to reduce to an object with something like this as the callback:(acc, item) => ({ ...acc, [item.label]: t => t.label === item.label }) parent LittleLily 1 month ago
tasks.reduce<Record<string, (t: typeof tasks[number]) => boolean>>((acc, item) => ..., {})
Also imo it's cleaner to reduce to an object with something like this as the callback:
(acc, item) => ({ ...acc, [item.label]: t => t.label === item.label })