I’m curious how you handle design docs when requirements change significantly during implementation. At some point, updates and corrections can start describing a somewhat different project from the one that originally went through review.
Is there a rule of thumb for when it’s enough to update the existing document, and when the design has changed enough to justify a new design doc and another review?
Is there a rule of thumb for when it’s enough to update the existing document, and when the design has changed enough to justify a new design doc and another review?