The “product-level memory” aspect is interesting to me. Code history can tell you what changed, but not necessarily what the product became.
I can see this becoming more valuable as coding agents make smaller, more frequent changes. At some point, someone still needs a higher-level explanation of what actually exists in the product.
Curious how you decide what qualifies as a feature versus an implementation detail.
I can see this becoming more valuable as coding agents make smaller, more frequent changes. At some point, someone still needs a higher-level explanation of what actually exists in the product.
Curious how you decide what qualifies as a feature versus an implementation detail.