It's curious that Samsung's lawyers didn't manage to bring about the invalidation during trial, if its lack of validity was evident enough that the patent office is now retracting it. I'm curious if
a) Samsung did present the evidence that the patent office relied on to invalidate but it was rejected by the jury
or
b) Samsung wasn't allowed to present it for some reason
or
c) Samsung didn't try to present it
Option a) or b) would provide yet another indication of a miscarriage of justice in the trial. Option c) would be be an indictment of Samsung's lawyers who seem to have performed quite poorly in many respects.
a) Samsung did present the evidence that the patent office relied on to invalidate but it was rejected by the jury
b) Samsung wasn't allowed to present it for some reason c) Samsung didn't try to present itOption a) or b) would provide yet another indication of a miscarriage of justice in the trial. Option c) would be be an indictment of Samsung's lawyers who seem to have performed quite poorly in many respects.