It is 100% how trade works. Free trade for both sides = good for both sides. Lopsided deals where one side gets the free flow of trade but the other side gets protectionism = exploitative.
What is the category error here? Where is the misunderstanding?
If you really believed what you wrote, why do you think trade deals exist in the first place? What function do you think they serve?
What is the category error here? Where is the misunderstanding?
If you really believed what you wrote, why do you think trade deals exist in the first place? What function do you think they serve?