Comment Comment by assumed_throwaw I don't want this to seem like a witch hunt, but I got an unpleasant surprise when I ran the text through Pangram...It got "100% AI" with "high" confidence, highlighting that it was likely "paraphrased or rewritten" [1].I know Pangram gets a lot of flak, but so far I've found it to be pretty reliable, especially since they claim to have a very low false-positive rate.I then compared it with the original version of the article published on the author's GitHub [2], but got the same disappointing result [3].And now I'm stuck. I don't know whether I should believe Pangram or the author of the article...[1] https://www.pangram.com/history/38ffe92b-0077-4bce-816a-b89b...[2] https://github.com/Suranjandas7/public_writing/commit/6b08ad...[3] https://www.pangram.com/history/e9fea5bf-a2cd-4ba2-b6b0-75e0... parent assumed_throwaw 2 months ago
It got "100% AI" with "high" confidence, highlighting that it was likely "paraphrased or rewritten" [1].
I know Pangram gets a lot of flak, but so far I've found it to be pretty reliable, especially since they claim to have a very low false-positive rate.
I then compared it with the original version of the article published on the author's GitHub [2], but got the same disappointing result [3].
And now I'm stuck. I don't know whether I should believe Pangram or the author of the article...
[1] https://www.pangram.com/history/38ffe92b-0077-4bce-816a-b89b...
[2] https://github.com/Suranjandas7/public_writing/commit/6b08ad...
[3] https://www.pangram.com/history/e9fea5bf-a2cd-4ba2-b6b0-75e0...