I'd agree with other posters - I'm seeing less hallucination; probably the model-makers are tuning to reduce that, because people make a big deal about it.
I see it as a small deal - it reminds us to check the responses against references.
LLMs are a statistical construction, and everyone accepts without complaint that statistical models have a predicted false-positive and false-negative rate.
I think of "hallucination" as a false positive; false negative is no answer when the model could have made a useful response.
I think there's some relation between our creativity and the LLM capability we dismissively call hallucination.
I see it as a small deal - it reminds us to check the responses against references. LLMs are a statistical construction, and everyone accepts without complaint that statistical models have a predicted false-positive and false-negative rate. I think of "hallucination" as a false positive; false negative is no answer when the model could have made a useful response. I think there's some relation between our creativity and the LLM capability we dismissively call hallucination.