Hi, one fellow HN commenter suggested to use a credible list of sources in my AI fact-checker skills. I promised to test and publish the results.
Test failed, and what I've found is interesting - as of 47 tested news outlet sources - 16 blocked AI requests with 400 error. (Reuters, WSJ, The New York Times, The Guardian, etc)
Blocked content still arriving from news aggregators, but model always prefer the source over any citation. Sometimes, data from aggregators were even different to original post.
If you have experienced this and found a solution - I'd be thrilled to hear about it. As for now - it's a gap I acknowledge and cannot overcome.
Test failed, and what I've found is interesting - as of 47 tested news outlet sources - 16 blocked AI requests with 400 error. (Reuters, WSJ, The New York Times, The Guardian, etc)
Blocked content still arriving from news aggregators, but model always prefer the source over any citation. Sometimes, data from aggregators were even different to original post.
If you have experienced this and found a solution - I'd be thrilled to hear about it. As for now - it's a gap I acknowledge and cannot overcome.