What other people have said about other, unrelated things has no bearing on what I'm saying about this particular thing. The illogical conclusions of nameless "others" are not an argument against my current conclusions. You're treating me as guilty by association.
You're also making an assumption that AI's acceptance WILL follow, just because the others were later accepted. You can't make that assumption at all.
You're also making an assumption that AI's acceptance WILL follow, just because the others were later accepted. You can't make that assumption at all.
Neither of these arguments are in good faith.