> A for loop is more readable than the lambda soup.
Let's assume you have a slice of strings you want to uppercase. Which of the following is more readable?
uppercased := slices.Map(inputSlice, strings.ToUpper)
// or
uppercased := make([]string, 0, len(inputSlice))
for _, s := range inputSlice {
uppercased = append(uppercased, strings.ToUpper(s))
}
Let's say you want to parse a bunch of user-given inputs into durations, surely the following is more readable?
parsed, err := slices.MapErr(inputstrings, time.ParseDuration)
I think map functions lead to cleaner code when used like the above, and a lot of for loops end up falling into those patterns.
Let's assume you have a slice of strings you want to uppercase. Which of the following is more readable?
Let's say you want to parse a bunch of user-given inputs into durations, surely the following is more readable? I think map functions lead to cleaner code when used like the above, and a lot of for loops end up falling into those patterns.