I am noticing a pattern where studies are dismissed as junk based on preformed opinions, specifically about "climate alarmists" you should consider why you are so quick to dismiss the majority of the research in indoor air quality.
There is one notable study about submariners that did not find impairment in one simulation, the consensus about it is selection bias and training. Submariners
are not the average population, both in terms of general fitness and in terms of self selecting, people who can't cope or perform in the high CO2 environment quit or fail. The finding of other studies is brain fog not total incompetence.
There is one notable study about submariners that did not find impairment in one simulation, the consensus about it is selection bias and training. Submariners are not the average population, both in terms of general fitness and in terms of self selecting, people who can't cope or perform in the high CO2 environment quit or fail. The finding of other studies is brain fog not total incompetence.
> https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11763298/ | Effects of Carbon Dioxide Therapy on Skin Wound Healing
That's cool, a bit of nuance though the studies are discussing applying CO2 directly at afflicted tissue not through breathing.