No, it's not satire. The difficulty of finding the optimal solution says nothing about what it takes to come within 99.999% of optimal with 99.999% probability.
So I'm not talking about the number of steps needed to prove optimality with a correct P algorithm versus an exponential one.
I'm only talking about how this applies to the efficient market hypothesis.
So I'm not talking about the number of steps needed to prove optimality with a correct P algorithm versus an exponential one.
I'm only talking about how this applies to the efficient market hypothesis.