I have a very low opinion of the current US administration, which might be a blindspot when they do something both horrible and not caveman-like in its sophistication. I’m genuinely surprised they would look into differential privacy (again: this sounds judgmental, but I’m just trying to confess my prejudice).
I’m more surprised that they were able to look into it and come to the conclusion that they should get rid of it… What could be the logic here?
I’m more surprised that they were able to look into it and come to the conclusion that they should get rid of it… What could be the logic here?