Comment Comment by dopidopHN2 > That just means not enough people did it.Indeed. When enough people call that when they switch the meeting time and change the voting rules. ( we suing for that )They still don't give a fuck. They really want to have more surveillance. Its like their is a vested interest ?> Until they make that illegal. What'll you do then?OK, let's make numbers illegal. Land of the free!Also, what does "making encryption illegal" entail, exactly? Does that encompass HTTPS?What does not scale exactly about using encryption at rest and point to point ? parent dopidopHN2 4 months ago
Indeed. When enough people call that when they switch the meeting time and change the voting rules. ( we suing for that )
They still don't give a fuck. They really want to have more surveillance. Its like their is a vested interest ?
> Until they make that illegal. What'll you do then?
OK, let's make numbers illegal. Land of the free!
Also, what does "making encryption illegal" entail, exactly? Does that encompass HTTPS?
What does not scale exactly about using encryption at rest and point to point ?