ggsql developer here. It's quite fun to see an alternative implementation of our syntax so early. Why did you decide on this path rather than working with the ggsql duckdb extension? (honest curious question - not trying to push you away from your path)
I can only imagine the load you might end up in if you have to keep feature parity with ggsql along with all the other features you have
I can only imagine the load you might end up in if you have to keep feature parity with ggsql along with all the other features you have