Comment

Comment by ag2718

A key benefit of KANs is expressivity, as each layer is significantly more expressive than an MLP layer. This can be seen in our benchmarks: KAN networks need fewer layers than MLPs to match or beat their performance, even in software.

However, on GPUs, KAN implementations are far less efficient than MLPs: since B-spline locality is hard to exploit and lookup operations aren't as efficient. This is your original point about MLPs training and running faster on modern architectures: each KAN layer is more expressive, but its poor hardware efficiency makes it a net negative (at least for current approaches).

On FPGAs, LUT lookups are cheap, so KANs' expressive layers map to very hardware-efficient implementations, and the resulting networks are thus much more compact and efficient than equivalent MLPs.

On your second point: low precision is certainly viable for both inference and learning (as shown in our work), and quantization can even have a mild regularizing effect. However, task performance generally worsens with lower precision (here and across the literature): the use of low precision is fundamentally a result of the efficiency-performance tradeoff.

parent ag2718 4 months ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton