Knowing what exact algorithm "thinking" is isn't a requirement. Automata class is enough to say "a Turing machine can implement it".
There are exactly two possibilities: thinking can be expressed as computation, or thinking requires hypercomputation.
I did acknowledge both, explicitly.
Which one?
I'm betting hard against the second one, by the way. Because it requires hypercomputational magic fairy dust to:
1) exist - physical Church-Turing thesis has to be proven wrong empirically
2) be so involved in the functioning of human brain that it cannot be substituted for anything else
Wishful thinking, in my eyes.
But that's the name of the game, isn't it? Anything but admitting that your mind is a glorified math construct implemented in wet meat.
There are exactly two possibilities: thinking can be expressed as computation, or thinking requires hypercomputation.
I did acknowledge both, explicitly.
Which one?
I'm betting hard against the second one, by the way. Because it requires hypercomputational magic fairy dust to:
1) exist - physical Church-Turing thesis has to be proven wrong empirically
2) be so involved in the functioning of human brain that it cannot be substituted for anything else
Wishful thinking, in my eyes.
But that's the name of the game, isn't it? Anything but admitting that your mind is a glorified math construct implemented in wet meat.