I agree with this redescription fallacy and the point being made here. Perhaps a better analogy to humans would be:
Humans appear to intelligenty communicate, however these are just cleverly disguised sound patterns produced by the brain that happen to increase the likelihood of food going into their mouths, and various similar reward attracting mechanisms that make survival outcomes more likely. So human intelligence could be reduced to
something like "fancy food-attracting algorithms" using the same fallacy.
I'm kind of on the fence on the subject of whether LLMs could be compared to the complexity of the human brain, myself.
Humans appear to intelligenty communicate, however these are just cleverly disguised sound patterns produced by the brain that happen to increase the likelihood of food going into their mouths, and various similar reward attracting mechanisms that make survival outcomes more likely. So human intelligence could be reduced to something like "fancy food-attracting algorithms" using the same fallacy.
I'm kind of on the fence on the subject of whether LLMs could be compared to the complexity of the human brain, myself.