I think this seems a pretty insane way of doing it; why not change the default behavior instead of making another driver with a separate name as well as keeping the old one too?
This is likely to be super confusing to new users; rumours that it's write safe and all the common examples will be fore the old driver...
IMHO they should have altered the defaults; people who require the extra performance will likely be the ones reading the changelogs / docs / these posts and notice.
This is likely to be super confusing to new users; rumours that it's write safe and all the common examples will be fore the old driver...
IMHO they should have altered the defaults; people who require the extra performance will likely be the ones reading the changelogs / docs / these posts and notice.