Why did you criticize his past arguments instead of the claims in this article? The one relevant claim you address is basically a shrug on your part. This seems to be purely a character attack of Zitron.
I agree that he is very one-sided, but I doubt his hit-rate is much worse than other pundits in the industry.
I agree that he is very one-sided, but I doubt his hit-rate is much worse than other pundits in the industry.