Comment

Comment by perching_aix

Really unsure why this is getting downvoted, to my understanding this is a massive, unsettled concern.

It wasn't even a disasm/pseudocode to formal spec flow, and then a separate human implementation. The same human has been in the loop throughout, and large parts of it were generated directly.

It's basically guaranteed tainted.

Edit: I should have skimmed a bit more patiently, there was in fact no "disasm/pseudocode + the human getting tainted" part to this apparently.

parent perching_aix 5 months ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton