“we”? i think it’s damn obvious that it’s not “we”. the world doesn’t get to move together until all differences are resolved, is that the progress you think we’ve made in the last 100 years? I don’t understand how talk like this goes unchallenged so often. it’s fine aspirationally but come on! I look at a growing economy like a bicycle, the slower it goes the less stable it is. in other words, you can’t just stop unless you want mass death or you want to transition to a stabilizing mechanism the world is yet unaware of. I would also suggest we don’t foolishly bully human nature with policy- there is a certain and deep injustice to that.
Life’s motto is to grow. asking it to not grow or to greatly hamper it? its outrageous really, especially without a genius respectable path to get there.
i don’t mind aspiration because dreaming is good but this one is a bit tired and uncontested.
and just so i’m not just complaining, i’ll suggest that people stop trying to be dubious global citizens in problem space that outstrips their capabilities and work to be better stewards of one’s self, family, friends. support /relatively/ steady growth.
Life’s motto is to grow. asking it to not grow or to greatly hamper it? its outrageous really, especially without a genius respectable path to get there. i don’t mind aspiration because dreaming is good but this one is a bit tired and uncontested. and just so i’m not just complaining, i’ll suggest that people stop trying to be dubious global citizens in problem space that outstrips their capabilities and work to be better stewards of one’s self, family, friends. support /relatively/ steady growth.