"AI-native hiring" is just faster keyword/vector matching.
Every atomic hiring step such as filtering applicants, moving to different stages involves,
we will be dealing with 100s of judgement parameters before we take any action forward.
What are we offloading to AI today? - just admin tasks or human judgements?
- Sourcing and filtering are intensive human judgements operations.
- Accepting applications, managing, organising, collaborating, outreach are most time admin consuming tasks in hiring pipeline.
Simple ATS sass automates most of these things.
AI is a great tool, but before fitting into hiring user flows where judgements >>> automations,
we need to resolve on fundamental principle, AI-augmented judgment or AI-replaced judgment?
Which you think is actually working well today for HR professionals?
Has AI helped, or just added noise?
Every atomic hiring step such as filtering applicants, moving to different stages involves, we will be dealing with 100s of judgement parameters before we take any action forward.
What are we offloading to AI today? - just admin tasks or human judgements?
- Sourcing and filtering are intensive human judgements operations. - Accepting applications, managing, organising, collaborating, outreach are most time admin consuming tasks in hiring pipeline.
Simple ATS sass automates most of these things.
AI is a great tool, but before fitting into hiring user flows where judgements >>> automations, we need to resolve on fundamental principle, AI-augmented judgment or AI-replaced judgment?
Which you think is actually working well today for HR professionals? Has AI helped, or just added noise?