Comment by maxibenner

This looks like a site I would like to use and trust. On the surface it presents itself as a reliable source, but there is no real information about who runs it, how they collect their data, or what their process is like. I can only assume that this is a vibe coded frontend with a vibe coded scraper behind it, made by a person who doesn't really understand the requirements of the domain.

  "MythosWatch exists because journalists, policymakers, and researchers need a citable record that distinguishes confirmed access from reported access from institutional response — without collapsing those distinctions into a single claim."

I cringe at this quote and I detest the new reality of slop in the guise of quality.