I agree / hope that’s what they meant. It seems disingenuous, though, to describe it as unreadable, since obviously something has to read it to bake it into the deploy. And given their apparent lack of effective security boundaries in one area, why should we assume that they’ve got the deploy system adequately locked down?
It’s not like I had a ton of trust in them before, but now they’ve lost almost all credibility.
It’s not like I had a ton of trust in them before, but now they’ve lost almost all credibility.