Quite the opposite. Review is the bottleneck. LLMs generate more code, hence more cognitive load on my mind to comprehend and review it all. Review isn't optional if it's a production system that other people use.
After I see how astonishingly poor LLMs are at decision-making (even the best ones, like Claude Opus or GPT 5.4) while writing code, I naturally stop trusting them in other areas of life too much to "just have a conversation with them and get all the answers".
It's all fun and games while the stakes are non-existent, but if the question really matters, would you trust an LLM fully as much as to not exercise thinking at all?
After I see how astonishingly poor LLMs are at decision-making (even the best ones, like Claude Opus or GPT 5.4) while writing code, I naturally stop trusting them in other areas of life too much to "just have a conversation with them and get all the answers".
It's all fun and games while the stakes are non-existent, but if the question really matters, would you trust an LLM fully as much as to not exercise thinking at all?