Seems to be llm written article and the tooling around the model is undeniably influenced by knowledge of the tests.
In all cases, GPT 3.5 isn’t a good benchmark for most serious uses and was considered to be pretty stupid, though I understand that isn’t the point of the article.
In all cases, GPT 3.5 isn’t a good benchmark for most serious uses and was considered to be pretty stupid, though I understand that isn’t the point of the article.