Here's my question:
If the attorney-client privilege, and more importantly, the work product doctrine don't apply here, would they also not apply to direct conversations between an attorney and an AI?
It seems to me that the court would need to apply some twisted logic to claim that those protections apply to an attorney, but not to a petitioner or respondent.
It seems to me that the court would need to apply some twisted logic to claim that those protections apply to an attorney, but not to a petitioner or respondent.