I kept seeing the same thing across engineering teams: everyone bought Copilot or Cursor seats, people used it for a few weeks, and then output didn't really change.
The tooling is good but teams are treating AI like autocomplete instead of integrating it into how they actually ship code.
My take is that AI starts making a real difference when you apply the same discipline you already have for software engineering.
Plan the work, implement, write tests, commit, open a PR, get it reviewed. If you just vibe code with no structure around it, you get messy diffs and hallucinated tests that nobody trusts.
So I'm building around that workflow. Think of it as giving AI the guardrails of your existing eng process.
I kept seeing the same thing across engineering teams: everyone bought Copilot or Cursor seats, people used it for a few weeks, and then output didn't really change.
The tooling is good but teams are treating AI like autocomplete instead of integrating it into how they actually ship code.
My take is that AI starts making a real difference when you apply the same discipline you already have for software engineering.
Plan the work, implement, write tests, commit, open a PR, get it reviewed. If you just vibe code with no structure around it, you get messy diffs and hallucinated tests that nobody trusts.
So I'm building around that workflow. Think of it as giving AI the guardrails of your existing eng process.