Comment Comment by sgbeal Please help me understand where the missing comma is supposed to be in:> their Membership Committee has decided to eject from membership all Collabora staff and partners over thirty people who ...Is it:1) "eject from membership all Collabora staff and partners, over thirty people ..."2) "eject from membership all Collabora staff and partners over thirty, people who ...":-?Edit: that's from the article this post leads to: <https://www.collaboraonline.com/blog/tdf-ejects-its-core-dev...>(Downvoted for asking for legitimate clarification? Seriously? Age discrimination _is_ a real thing, so there's no way of knowing, for lack of a comma, which interpretation was intended.) parent sgbeal 7 months ago
> their Membership Committee has decided to eject from membership all Collabora staff and partners over thirty people who ...
Is it:
1) "eject from membership all Collabora staff and partners, over thirty people ..."
2) "eject from membership all Collabora staff and partners over thirty, people who ..."
:-?
Edit: that's from the article this post leads to: <https://www.collaboraonline.com/blog/tdf-ejects-its-core-dev...>
(Downvoted for asking for legitimate clarification? Seriously? Age discrimination _is_ a real thing, so there's no way of knowing, for lack of a comma, which interpretation was intended.)