> I've bought clothing from only countries with better than not labor laws for the past several years.
This has the effect of giving employees who already make, say, $100 / day more options as to where to work, while refusing to give those who make $10/day (or $1/day) workers oversees choices like this.
I find this effect to be stunningly at odds with most of the stated political goals that usually correlate with this opinion.
If redistribution from the $100/day person to the $50/day person is good, why is redistributing employment options from a $10/day person to a $100/day person a good thing?
This has the effect of giving employees who already make, say, $100 / day more options as to where to work, while refusing to give those who make $10/day (or $1/day) workers oversees choices like this.
I find this effect to be stunningly at odds with most of the stated political goals that usually correlate with this opinion.
If redistribution from the $100/day person to the $50/day person is good, why is redistributing employment options from a $10/day person to a $100/day person a good thing?