> And then there's explorative testing, where I always found a good QA invaluable.
Yes, I agree. We do this too. Findings are followed by a post-mortem-like process: - fix the problem
- produce an automated test
- evaluate why the feature wasn't autotested properly
Yes, I agree. We do this too. Findings are followed by a post-mortem-like process: - fix the problem - produce an automated test - evaluate why the feature wasn't autotested properly