Nitpicky comment. The article says
> "We call this the “light and shade” of AI: the same capabilities that lead to > benefits also produce harms. The two sides are entangled."
Why not call it a "double-edged sword" or something else? Light and shade are opposites but not necessarily two products from the same tool. It just irks me.
Why not call it a "double-edged sword" or something else? Light and shade are opposites but not necessarily two products from the same tool. It just irks me.