Comment Comment by mcherm The post claims (tongue-in-cheek, of course) that their customer owns the resulting code.But that's not true!According to binding precedent, works created by an AI are not protected by copyright. NO ONE OWNS THEM!!!I think maybe this is a good thing, but honestly, it's hard to tell. parent mcherm 8 months ago
But that's not true!
According to binding precedent, works created by an AI are not protected by copyright. NO ONE OWNS THEM!!!
I think maybe this is a good thing, but honestly, it's hard to tell.