tl;dr: "We should legislate that developing, distributing, or running a program on generally used computing hardware does not constitute patent infringement."
He goes on to say "generally used computing hardware" is the opposite of "special-purpose hardware" but I think that definition needs to be really explicit.
Of course then, would anyone in Congress actually pass such a bill?
He goes on to say "generally used computing hardware" is the opposite of "special-purpose hardware" but I think that definition needs to be really explicit.
Of course then, would anyone in Congress actually pass such a bill?